Dose-Response Effects of Patient Engagement on Health Outcomes in an mHealth Intervention: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors
Li, YiranGuo, Yan
Hong, Y Alicia
Zeng, Yu
Monroe-Wise, Aliza
Zeng, Chengbo
Zhu, Mengting
Zhang, Hanxi
Qiao, Jiaying
Xu, Zhimeng
Cai, Weiping
Li, Linghua
Liu, Cong
UMass Chan Affiliations
Population and Quantitative Health SciencesDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2022-01-04Keywords
dose–response relationshipgeneralized linear mixed effects model
long-term effect
mHealth
patient engagement
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: The dose-response relationship between patient engagement and long-term intervention effects in mobile health (mHealth) interventions are understudied. Studies exploring long-term and potentially changing relationships between patient engagement and health outcomes in mHealth interventions are needed. Objective: This study aims to examine dose-response relationships between patient engagement and 3 psychosocial outcomes in an mHealth intervention, Run4Love, using repeated measurements of outcomes at baseline and 3, 6, and 9 months. Methods: This study is a secondary analysis using longitudinal data from the Run4Love trial, a randomized controlled trial with 300 people living with HIV and elevated depressive symptoms to examine the effects of a 3-month mHealth intervention on reducing depressive symptoms and improving quality of life (QOL). We examined the relationships between patient engagement and depressive symptoms, QOL, and perceived stress in the intervention group (N=150) using 4-time-point outcome measurements. Patient engagement was assessed using the completion rate of course assignments and frequency of items completed. Cluster analysis was used to categorize patients into high- and low-engagement groups. Generalized linear mixed effects models were conducted to investigate the dose-response relationships between patient engagement and outcomes. Results: The cluster analysis identified 2 clusters that were distinctively different from each other. The first cluster comprised 72 participants with good compliance to the intervention, completing an average of 74% (53/72) of intervention items (IQR 0.22). The second cluster comprised 78 participants with low compliance to the intervention, completing an average of 15% (11/72) of intervention items (IQR 0.23). Results of the generalized linear mixed effects models showed that, compared with the low-engagement group, the high-engagement group had a significant reduction in more depressive symptoms (β=-1.93; P=.008) and perceived stress (β=-1.72; P<.001) and an improved QOL (β=2.41; P=.01) over 9 months. From baseline to 3, 6, and 9 months, the differences in depressive symptoms between the 2 engagement groups were 0.8, 1.6, 2.3, and 3.7 points, respectively, indicating widening between-group differences over time. Similarly, between-group differences in QOL and perceived stress increased over time (group differences in QOL: 0.9, 1.9, 4.7, and 5.1 points, respectively; group differences in the Perceived Stress Scale: 0.9, 1.4, 2.3, and 3.0 points, respectively). Conclusions: This study revealed a positive long-term dose-response relationship between patient engagement and 3 psychosocial outcomes among people living with HIV and elevated depressive symptoms in an mHealth intervention over 9 months using 4 time-point repeat measurement data. The high- and low-engagement groups showed significant and widening differences in depressive symptoms, QOL, and perceived stress at the 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-ups. Future mHealth interventions should improve patient engagement to achieve long-term and sustained intervention effects. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-IPR-17012606; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=21019.Source
Li Y, Guo Y, Hong YA, Zeng Y, Monroe-Wise A, Zeng C, Zhu M, Zhang H, Qiao J, Xu Z, Cai W, Li L, Liu C. Dose-Response Effects of Patient Engagement on Health Outcomes in an mHealth Intervention: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 4;10(1):e25586. doi: 10.2196/25586. PMID: 34982724; PMCID: PMC8767469.DOI
10.2196/25586Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/52190PubMed ID
34982724Rights
©Yiran Li, Yan Guo, Y Alicia Hong, Yu Zeng, Aliza Monroe-Wise, Chengbo Zeng, Mengting Zhu, Hanxi Zhang, Jiaying Qiao, Zhimeng Xu, Weiping Cai, Linghua Li, Cong Liu. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 04.01.2022. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.; Attribution 4.0 InternationalDistribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2196/25586
Scopus Count
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as ©Yiran Li, Yan Guo, Y Alicia Hong, Yu Zeng, Aliza Monroe-Wise, Chengbo Zeng, Mengting Zhu, Hanxi Zhang, Jiaying Qiao,
Zhimeng Xu, Weiping Cai, Linghua Li, Cong Liu. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org),
04.01.2022. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information,
a link to the original publication on https://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.