Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFaro, Jamie M
dc.contributor.authorYue, Kai-Lou
dc.contributor.authorLeach, Heather J
dc.contributor.authorCrisafio, Mary E
dc.contributor.authorLemon, Stephenie C
dc.contributor.authorWang, Bo
dc.contributor.authorMcManus, David D
dc.contributor.authorSadasivam, Rajani S
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-13T15:51:47Z
dc.date.available2023-07-13T15:51:47Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-15
dc.identifier.citationFaro JM, Yue KL, Leach HJ, Crisafio ME, Lemon SC, Wang B, McManus DD, Sadasivam RS. Development and pilot testing of a clinic implementation program delivering physical activity electronic referrals to cancer survivors. Transl Behav Med. 2023 Jun 15:ibad035. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad035. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37318360.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1613-9860
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/tbm/ibad035en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37318360
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/52281
dc.description.abstractProvider physical activity referrals are recommended for cancer survivors, though barriers exist to clinical system integration. To develop and test ActivityChoice, an electronic referral (eReferral) clinic implementation program referring cancer survivors to physical activity programs of their choice. In Phase 1, we conducted semi-structured interviews with Cancer Center clinicians (n = 4) and cancer-focused physical activity program leaders (n = 3) assessing adaptations needed to implement an eReferral previously designed for another context. In Phase 2, we pilot-tested clinician-delivered referrals to survivors in two 12-week Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycles. We examined feasibility using descriptive statistics (clinicians' adoption and engagement, patient referrals, and physical activity program enrollment) and acceptability through semi-structured interviews with enrolled clinicians (n = 4) and referred patients (n = 9). ActivityChoice included a secure referral webform, text message/email referral confirmations, clinician training/booster sessions, visual reminders, and referrals to in-person or virtual group physical activity programs. Results for each PDSA cycle respectively included: 41% (n = 7) and 53% (n = 8) of clinicians adopted ActivityChoice; 18 and 36 patients were referred; 39% (n = 7) and 33% (n = 12) of patients enrolled in programs, and 30% (n = 4) and 14% (n = 5) of patients deferred enrollment. Patients and clinicians appreciated the referrals and choices. A printed handout describing both programs was added to the clinic workflow for Cycle 2, which yielded more referrals, but lower program enrollment rates. Clinic-based eReferrals to choices of physical activity programs were feasible and acceptable by clinicians and patients. Added clinic workflow support may facilitate referrals.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTranslational Behavioral Medicineen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibad035en_US
dc.rights© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2023. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.en_US
dc.subjectCanceren_US
dc.subjectImplementationen_US
dc.subjectPhysical activityen_US
dc.subjectReferralsen_US
dc.subjectSurvivorshipen_US
dc.titleDevelopment and pilot testing of a clinic implementation program delivering physical activity electronic referrals to cancer survivorsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleTranslational behavioral medicine
dc.source.countryUnited States
dc.source.countryEngland
dc.identifier.journalTranslational behavioral medicine
dc.contributor.departmentMedicineen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPopulation and Quantitative Health Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPrevention Research Centeren_US
dc.contributor.departmentBiostatistics and Health Services Researchen_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record