Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDao, Hang Viet
dc.contributor.authorDao, Quan Viet
dc.contributor.authorLam, Hoa Ngoc
dc.contributor.authorHoang, Long Bao
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Van Thi
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Thuy Thi
dc.contributor.authorVu, Dat Quoc
dc.contributor.authorPokorny, Christopher S
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Hoa Lan
dc.contributor.authorAllison, Jeroan J.
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Robert J
dc.contributor.authorDao, An Thi Minh
dc.contributor.authorDo, Toan Thanh Thi
dc.contributor.authorDao, Long Van
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-20T19:21:13Z
dc.date.available2023-07-20T19:21:13Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-05
dc.identifier.citationDao HV, Dao QV, Lam HN, Hoang LB, Nguyen VT, Nguyen TT, Vu DQ, Pokorny CS, Nguyen HL, Allison J, Goldberg RJ, Dao ATM, Do TTT, Dao LV. Effectiveness of using a patient education mobile application to improve the quality of bowel preparation: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2023 Jun;10(1):e001107. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001107. PMID: 37277203; PMCID: PMC10255132.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2054-4774
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001107en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37277203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/52331
dc.description.abstractAims: To determine the effectiveness of a mobile application (app) in improving the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Method: An endoscopist-blinded randomised controlled trial enrolled patients who were undergoing a colonoscopy on the same day of bowel preparation. The intervention used a Vietnamese mobile app that provides instructions on bowel preparation while patients in the comparison group received conventional instructions. Outcomes included the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) to assess the quality of bowel preparation and the polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). Results: The study recruited 515 patients (256 in the intervention group). The median age was 42 years, 50.9% were females, 69.1% high school graduates and higher, and 45.2% from urban area. Patients in the intervention group had higher adherence to instructions (60.9% vs 52.4%, p=0.05) and longer length of taking laxatives (mean difference 0.17 hours, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.27). The intervention did not reduce the risk of poor bowel cleansing (total BBPS<6) in both overall (7.4% vs 7.7%; risk ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.76) and subgroup analysis. PDR and ADR were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: The mobile app providing instructions on proper bowel preparation improved the practice during bowel preparation but did not improve the quality of bowel cleansing or PDR.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001107en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectclinical trialsen_US
dc.subjectcolonoscopyen_US
dc.subjectmobile applicationsen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of using a patient education mobile application to improve the quality of bowel preparation: a randomised controlled trialen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleBMJ open gastroenterology
dc.source.volume10
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.countryUnited States
dc.source.countryEngland
dc.identifier.journalBMJ open gastroenterology
refterms.dateFOA2023-07-20T19:21:13Z
dc.contributor.departmentPopulation and Quantitative Health Sciencesen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
e001107.full.pdf
Size:
712.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.