Use of helical tack system for management of a high-risk fibrotic peptic ulcer
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
UMass Chan Affiliations
MedicineDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2022-10-01
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background and aims: GI bleeding because of peptic ulcer disease is a well-described entity in its diagnosis and management. Although hemostatic clips and thermal therapy have been the primary tools in bleeding from peptic ulcer disease, some bleeds remain refractory. New data have shown that obliteration of the underlying arterial blood flow is needed to control refractory peptic ulcer bleeding. Although this has been shown with over-the-scope clips, we present a case where GI bleeding is controlled via a helical tack system. Although there are several available tools that can be used for treatment of upper GI bleeds, there remains a need for devices that can be used when standard methods of closure, such as with clips, cannot be performed because of a challenging location or friable mucosa. The aim of this video case is to demonstrate the use of a novel helical tack system as a salvage technique in the treatment of challenging upper GI bleeds. Methods: One case of a bleeding GI ulcer that was refractory to standard endoscopic clips was identified. Results: In this case, the ulcer closure was achieved using the helical tack system. There were no adverse events. The patient did not require additional surgical or endoscopic interventions. Conclusions: The helical tack system is a novel device that may be useful as a salvage method for the cessation of GI bleeds refractory to standard clips. Additional comparative studies are needed to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of this system relative to other closure tools.Source
Rau S, Hanscom M, Abdelfattah A, Rau R, Rau P, Marya NB. Use of helical tack system for management of a high-risk fibrotic peptic ulcer. VideoGIE. 2022 Oct 1;8(1):42-45. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2022.08.017. PMID: 36644244; PMCID: PMC9832219.DOI
10.1016/j.vgie.2022.08.017Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/53167PubMed ID
36644244Rights
Copyright 2023 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY- NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).; Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalDistribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.vgie.2022.08.017
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright 2023 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-
NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).