Initial single-center experience using Fiber Optic RealShape guidance in complex endovascular aortic repair
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Finnesgard, Eric JSimons, Jessica P
Jones, Douglas W
Judelson, Dejah R
Aiello, Francesco A
Boitano, Laura T
Sorensen, Caitlin M
Nguyen, Tammy T
Schanzer, Andres
UMass Chan Affiliations
SurgeryDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2022-11-13
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Objective: In the present study, we have described the technical success using Fiber Optic RealShape (FORS) endovascular guidance and its effects on the overall procedural time and radiation usage during complex endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Methods: Fenestrated and branched EVARs performed at a single center from 2017 to 2022 were prospectively studied. FORS-guided procedures were matched retrospectively 1:3 to non-FORS-guided procedures by the incorporated target arteries and body mass index. Technical success was defined as successful target vessel cannulation using FORS for the entirety of navigation (wire insertion to exchange for a stiff wire). The predictors of technical success were evaluated via logistic regression. The procedural times and radiation doses were compared between the matched cohorts using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: A total of 21 FORS-guided procedures were matched to 61 non-FORS-guided procedures. A total of 95 FORS cannulations were attempted (87 for the visceral target artery and 8 for the bifurcate gate). Technical success was achieved in 81 cannulations (85%); 15 (16%) were completed without the use of live fluoroscopy. The univariate predictors of FORS technical success included <50% target artery stenosis, <50% target artery calcification, and the target vessel attempted (P < .05 for each). FORS failures were attributed to device material properties in six cases, device failure in two cases, and the wire/catheter combination in six. The use of FORS guidance was associated with shorter median procedural and fluoroscopy times and a lower dose area product and air kerma (P ≤ .0001 for each). Conclusions: The results from our initial experience with FORS during complex EVAR, including our learning curve, has shown promise, with acceptable technical success and reductions in procedural times and radiation usage. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02050113.Source
Finnesgard EJ, Simons JP, Jones DW, Judelson DR, Aiello FA, Boitano LT, Sorensen CM, Nguyen TT, Schanzer A. Initial single-center experience using Fiber Optic RealShape guidance in complex endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2023 Apr;77(4):975-981. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.11.041. Epub 2022 Nov 13. PMID: 36384183.DOI
10.1016/j.jvs.2022.11.041Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/53228PubMed ID
36384183Rights
Copyright 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the So- ciety for Vascular Surgery. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC- ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).; Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalDistribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jvs.2022.11.041
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the So-
ciety for Vascular Surgery. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-
ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).