Mazor, Kathleen M.Roblin, Douglas W.Greene, Sarah M.Fouayzi, HassanGallagher, Thomas H.2022-08-232022-08-232015-11-032016-02-24BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Nov 3. pii: bmjqs-2015-004353. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004353. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004353">Link to article on publisher's site</a>2044-5415 (Linking)10.1136/bmjqs-2015-00435326534996https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/30589BACKGROUND: Full disclosure of harmful errors to patients, including a statement of regret, an explanation, acceptance of responsibility and commitment to prevent recurrences is the current standard for physicians in the USA. OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which primary care physicians' perceptions of event-level, physician-level and organisation-level factors influence intent to disclose a medical error in challenging situations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey containing two hypothetical vignettes: (1) delayed diagnosis of breast cancer, and (2) care coordination breakdown causing a delayed response to patient symptoms. In both cases, multiple physicians shared responsibility for the error, and both involved oncology diagnoses. SETTING: The study was conducted in the context of the HMO Cancer Research Network Cancer Communication Research Center. PARTICIPANTS: Primary care physicians from three integrated healthcare delivery systems located in Washington, Massachusetts and Georgia; responses from 297 participants were included in these analyses. MAIN MEASURES: The dependent variable intent to disclose included intent to provide an apology, an explanation, information about the cause and plans for preventing recurrences. Independent variables included event-level factors (responsibility for the event, perceived seriousness of the event, predictions about a lawsuit); physician-level factors (value of patient-centred communication, communication self-efficacy and feelings about practice); organisation-level factors included perceived support for communication and time constraints. KEY RESULTS: A majority of respondents would not fully disclose in either situation. The strongest predictors of disclosure were perceived personal responsibility, perceived seriousness of the event and perceived value of patient-centred communication. These variables were consistently associated with intent to disclose. CONCLUSION: To make meaningful progress towards improving disclosure; physicians, risk managers, organisational leaders, professional organisations and accreditation bodies need to understand the factors which influence disclosure. Such an understanding is required to inform institutional policies and provider training.en-USCommunicationDiagnostic errorsPatient-centred careBioethics and Medical EthicsHealth and Medical AdministrationHealth Services AdministrationHealth Services ResearchOncologyPrimary CareJournal Articlehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/faculty_pubs/8678205590faculty_pubs/867