Betz, Marian E.Sullivan, Ashley F.Manton, Anne P.Espinola, Janice A.Miller, IvanCamargo, Carlos A. Jr.Boudreaux, Edwin DBoyer, Edward W.Clark, Robin E.Coleman, Mardia A.Feldman, Barry N.ED-SAFE Investigators2022-08-232022-08-232013-02-202013-05-29Depress Anxiety. 2013 Feb 20. doi: 10.1002/da.22071. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/da.22071" target="_blank">Link to article on publisher's site</a>1091-4269 (Linking)10.1002/da.2207123426881https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/28529The ED-SAFE Investigators include Edward W. Boyer, Robin E. Clark, Mardia A. Coleman, and Barry N. Feldman of the University of Massachusetts Medical School.BACKGROUND: We sought to examine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of emergency department (ED) providers concerning suicidal patient care and to identify characteristics associated with screening for suicidal ideation (SI). METHODS: Six hundred thirty-one providers at eight EDs completed a voluntary, anonymous survey (79% response rate). RESULTS: The median participant age was 35 (interquartile range: 30-44) years and 57% of the participants were females. Half (48%) were nurses and half were attending (22%) or resident (30%) physicians. More expressed confidence in SI screening skills (81-91%) than in skills to assess risk severity (64-70%), counsel patients (46-56%), or create safety plans (23-40%), with some differences between providers. Few thought mental health provider staffing was almost always sufficient (6-20%) or that suicidal patient treatment was almost always a top ED priority (15-21%). More nurses (37%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31-42%) than physicians (7%, 95% CI 4-10%) reported screening most or all patients for SI; this difference persisted after multivariable adjustment. In multivariable analysis, other factors associated with screening most or all patients for SI were self-confidence in skills, (odds ratio [OR] 1.60, 95% CI 1.17-2.18), feeling that suicidal patient care was a top ED priority (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.11-2.69) and 5+ postgraduate years of clinical experience (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.03-4.13). CONCLUSIONS: ED providers reported confidence in suicide screening skills but gaps in further assessment, counseling, or referral skills. Efforts to promote better identification of suicidal patients should be accompanied by a commensurate effort to improve risk assessment and management skills, along with improved access to mental health specialists.en-USSuicideSuicidal IdeationSuicide, AttemptedEmergency Service, HospitalEmergency Medical ServicesMental Health ServicesEmergency MedicineHealth Services AdministrationHealth Services ResearchMental and Social HealthPsychiatryPsychiatry and PsychologyKnowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Emergency Department Providers in the Care of Suicidal PatientsJournal Articlehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/emed_pp/724180663emed_pp/72