The '16-hour rule': a giant step, but in which direction

Popkin, Joel H.Eissa, Khaled E.Mazor, Kathleen M.Lemay, Celeste A.2022-08-232022-08-232015-08-012016-05-09Am J Med. 2015 Aug;128(8):922-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.04.022. Epub 2015 May 14. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.04.022">Link to article on publisher's site</a>0002-9343 (Linking)10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.04.02225981692https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/30669The purpose of our study is to examine postgraduate year PGY-1 resident perceptions of educational and patient care experiences in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) through a survey of 2 groups completing a first year of training before and after the 16-hour rule change.en-USAdultFatigueFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMalePatient Care*Quality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States*Work Schedule ToleranceMedical EducationThe '16-hour rule': a giant step, but in which directionJournal Articlehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/faculty_pubs/9478575161faculty_pubs/947